Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)




"I've been using IQFeed 4 in a multi-threaded situation for the last week or two on 2600 symbols or so with 100 simultaneous daily charts, and I have had 100% responsiveness." - Comment from Scott
"I started a trial a few weeks back before the market went wild. DTN.IQ didn’t miss anything and beat my other provider. I decided to stay with you because of the great service through all the volatility." - Comment from Mike
"Thank God for your Data Feed as the only Zippers I see are on my pants (LOL), and no more 200 pip spikes to mess up charts." - Comment from Spiro via Email
"I am very pleased with the DTNIQ system for quotes and news." - Comment from Larry
"I use IQ Feed, Great stuff as far as data analysis information, storage and retrieval is concerned." - Comment from Public Forum
"Thank you so much - awesome feed, awesome service!" - Comment from Greg via Email
"I was with ******* for 4 years at $230 a month, this is a huge savings for me, GOD BLESS YOU PEOPLE," - Comment from T.S. via Email
"Its working FABULOUSLY for me!! Holy cow...there has been so much I've been missing lately, and with this feed and Linnsoft software...I'm in the game now." - Comment from Chris R.
"I like you guys better than *******...much more stable and a whole lot fewer issues." - Comment from Philip
"I'm satisfied with IQFeed. It's the most reliable and fastest quote feed I have ever used. Although I'm a resident in China, it's still very fast!" - Comment from Xiaofei
Home  Search  Register  Login  Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather
Follow DTNMarkets on Twitter
DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter
»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »Data and Content Support »Possible incorrect NQ voume on 11/2
Author Topic: Possible incorrect NQ voume on 11/2 (1 messages, Page 1 of 1)

sharpshorts
-Interested User-
Posts: 14
Joined: Aug 16, 2004


Posted: Nov 13, 2005 09:56 AM          Msg. 1 of 1
Would you check the data for @NQZ5 on 11/2 between 16:14:59 and 17:19:15 for a possible incorrect volume figure?

I'm trying to deturmine if this is a problem with the way QT builds Volume charts or if there is indeed a "bad" data line somewhere in that time span...

After backfilling with IQFEED using either @NQZ5 or @NQ#, QutoteTracker's raw data shows 305,139 volume @ 17:19:15 on 11/02/05.
This causes QT's Volume Charts to produce many horizontal lines for the price bars with that time stamp...(around 50 dashed lines on a 6K Volume chart, 28 dashed lines on a 10K volume chart etc...)


Thanks

Note - sorry if the formating below doesn't work right...

QT raw data shows the following lines:

11/02/05... 16:15:45... 1610... 1610... 1610... 5
11/02/05... 16:15:59... 1610... 1610... 1610... 5
11/02/05... 16:30:15... 1608.5... 1608.5... 1608.5... -306307
11/02/05... 16:30:30... 1609... 1609... 1609... 53
11/02/05... 16:30:45... 1608... 1608... 1608... 53
more "normal" data lines follow until:
11/02/05... 17:18:30... 1609... 1609... 1609... 1
11/02/05... 17:18:45... 1609... 1609... 1609... 2
11/02/05... 17:18:59... 1609... 1609... 1609... 1
11/02/05... 17:19:15... 1609... 1609... 1609... 305139
11/02/05... 17:19:30... 1609... 1609... 1609... 1
11/02/05... 17:19:45... 1609... 1609... 1609... 1
more "normal" data lines continue...
 

 

Time: Thu May 16, 2024 11:59 AM CFBB v1.2.0 12 ms.
© AderSoftware 2002-2003