DTN IQFeed, DTN.IQ, DTN ProphetX Support Forums

Join the 80,000 other DTN customers who enjoy the fastest, most reliable data available. There is no better value than DTN!

(Move your cursor to this area to pause scrolling)

"DTN feed was the only feed that consistently matched Bloomberg feed for BID/ASK data verification work these past years......DTN feed is a must for my supply & demand based trading using Cumulative Delta" - Comment from Public Forum Post

"DTN has never given me problems. It is incredibly stable. In fact I've occasionally lost the data feed from Interactive Brokers, but still been able to trade because I'm getting good data from DTN." - Comment from Leighton

"This is an excellent value, the system is generous (allowing for 500 stocks) and stable (and really is tick-by-tick), and the support is fantastic." - Comment from Shirin via Email

"I "bracket trade" all major news releases and I have not found one lag or glitch with DTN.IQ feed. I am very comfortable with their feed under all typical news conditions (Fed releases, employment numbers, etc)." - Comment from Public Forum

"You are either overstaffed or people just don't have problems with your feed because customer support always answers the phone quickly." - Comment from Jay via Email

"IQ feed works very well, does not have all of the normal interruptions I have grown used to on *******" - Comment from Mark

"The service is great, I see a noticeable improvement in my volume profiles over [broker]'s data feed" - Comment from Larry

"I like you guys better than *******...much more stable and a whole lot fewer issues." - Comment from Philip

"This beats the pants off CQG, I am definitely switching to the ProphetX 3.0!" - Comment from Stephen

"I cannot believe what a difference it makes trading with ProphetX!" - Comment from Bruce in Los Angeles

Home

Recent Posts

Information on DTN's Industries:
DTN Oil & Gas | DTN Trading | DTN Agriculture | DTN Weather

DTN.IQ/IQFeed on Twitter
DTN News and Analysis on Twitter

»Forums Index »Archive (2017 and earlier) »Data and Content Support »Again: possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE#

Author	Topic: Again: possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE# (5 messages, Page 1 of 1)
mvvcorp -Interested User- Posts: 24 Joined: Apr 7, 2010	Posted: Apr 5, 2011 05:49 PM Msg. 1 of 5 Possible wrong continuous contracts LL# and IE#. I've downloaded tick history (4 months) for LL# (continuous ) and LLU11 (single). LL# ~ 2 Mb (ASCII file) LLU11~ 20 Mb (ASCII file) difference - 10 times! It means that continuous contract have less liquidity than single contract (at 10 times!). Obviously something wrong with continuous contract LL# (as it was for QGC#) The same is for IE#
mvvcorp -Interested User- Posts: 24 Joined: Apr 7, 2010	Posted: Apr 5, 2011 06:10 PM Msg. 2 of 5 LG# "lost" ALL(!) liquidity between 28-feb-2011, 28-mar-2011 ! And another 4-5 months in 2010. It looks like LG# have the same problem - wrong rolling dates. PS Why is it so hard to keep accurate rolling dates for continuous contracts?
Stan S -DTN Guru- Posts: 256 Joined: Apr 13, 2006	Posted: Apr 6, 2011 08:07 AM Msg. 3 of 5 Hi Mvvcorp, Our Market Integrity dept is checking the data & contracts. I will let you know what they find out. Stan S What we do today, determines how people remember us forever. Be the positive force in someone life.
Stan S -DTN Guru- Posts: 256 Joined: Apr 13, 2006	Posted: Apr 7, 2011 07:47 AM Msg. 4 of 5 Good Morning Mvvcorp. This should be fixed over the weekend. We’re going to eliminate all other contract months from charting except H/M/U/Z. This will help the chart look a lot smoother. Stan S What we do today, determines how people remember us forever. Be the positive force in someone life.
mvvcorp -Interested User- Posts: 24 Joined: Apr 7, 2010	Posted: Apr 7, 2011 07:35 PM Msg. 5 of 5 Thank you Please, let us know when the process will be over.